9/19/2023 0 Comments Optimage health![]() ![]() it doesn’t offer as many setting options as ImageOptim.there is no web service or API interface.For this reason, here is a list of points that Optimage CANNOT offer: I dare to doubt whether this possibility is important for everyone, but I would like to say it nonetheless. I have to say that I find the Photoshop plugin from TinyJPG or TinyPNG extremely useful, because I edit all my photos for the blog posts in Photoshop first and then optimize them and save them with the plugin. It is clear to me that you cannot make a serious comparison of photos if you compress this comparison image with the two images with TinyJPG and incorporate it into the blog as a JPG. In this direction, one cannot therefore search for the difference in the file size of the output files.īy the way, my picture embedded here with the two comparison photos is only for decorative purposes. There were no visible JPG compressions or anything like that. Even after several minutes of visual inspection at 100%, I couldn't find any areas that were noticeably different. Since the file sizes were so different for the two tools, I looked at a test photo in detail and tried to find any visible differences. Visible differences between TinyJPG and Optimage? Optimage and TinyJPG in comparison - Attention: This photo is of course compressed again and cannot be used as a comparison! I had done the comparison in 100% view in the preview app on the Mac. If you have large areas of the same color in the picture, one seems to be better, while the other can score with gradients or other special features. Optimage cannot score with these photos either:Īs you can see, as with most other tools, it all depends on the source material. The image optimization programs had to work with the full resolution. For the article I have scaled the photo down to a smaller resolution. Optimage test photo 2: Here, too, TinyJPG delivers the smaller file. Even if I calculate the image to a height of 1200 pixels and save it with TinyJPG, Optimage can no longer optimize anything (0%). In this case, TinyJPG performed significantly better than Optimage. Photoshop "Save as JPG (high quality)": 1,0 MB.To see how the Optimage Mac app gets out of a photo compared to Photoshop's "Save for Web" feature, I downloaded the original-size photo above from the iPhone XS. Test compared to the Photoshop function, HEIC and TinyJPG In comparison: Photoshop JPEG storage, TinyJPG and Optimage (Photo: Sir Apfelot). TinyJPG has already done good preparatory work. The software had to fit with many photos. I have the feeling that these photos in particular, which have large dark or monochrome areas, could be made smaller by Optimage. In the table you can see that not all images could be compressed better. ImageOptim offers many setting options and also understands how to optimize nested folders with many photos using drag and drop. Nonetheless, ImageOptim is a recommendation for anyone looking for free Mac software to compress image files. The list always showed 0% for optimization. In my tests, however, it was no longer able to improve the photos that I had previously compressed with TinyPNG/JPG (when I activated "lossless"). ![]() The tool ImageOptim is an image reducer that performed better than TinyPNG in most tests, Short pixels, Imagify.io and other tools provided. The Optimage tool is a Mac app for image optimization and compression of image files. This post here is mainly dedicated to Opimage, because I didn't know this image optimizer and for that reason I tested it with various competitors. Short insertion: The following is about "Optimage" and "ImageOptim" - both tools, which unfortunately have a very similar name. Sir Apfelot recommendation: Clean up your Mac hard drive with CleanMyMac Risk of confusion: Optimage and ImageOptim ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |